Google
Released April 2, 2026

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Google Gemma 4 26B A4B: Mixture-of-Experts open model with 26B total but only 4B active parameters per token, running near 4B model speed with 256K context.

Inputs
Image
Text
Video
Outputs
Text

Model Overview

Capabilities, design details, and architectural traits

Gemma 4 26B A4B - MoE Open Model for High-Throughput Inference

Gemma 4 26B A4B is Google's Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model in the Gemma 4 family. The A4B in its name signals its sparse activation pattern - only a subset of its total parameters activates per token during inference. Google officially documents it as running almost as fast as a much smaller dense model, while carrying the capacity of a larger model for routing and expert diversity.

TraitDetail
MoE inference patternFull set of parameters loaded into memory; only a sparse active subset used per token - explicitly designed for high-throughput with latency close to a small dense model
Documented speedRuns almost as fast as a much smaller dense model, contrasting with the dense sibling which maximizes raw quality
MTP (Multi-Token Prediction)Supported but MoE-specific: gains depend on batch size; at batch size 1, expert weight reuse is limited and speedups are not guaranteed across all hardware
Context window256K tokens - shared with sibling variants in the family
Architecture reuseServes as the base architecture for DiffusionGemma, Google's experimental discrete text-diffusion model

High-Throughput Positioning within Gemma 4

Within the Gemma 4 family, the 26B A4B is the variant explicitly designated for high-throughput use. Where the dense model is positioned to maximize raw quality and fine-tuning depth, the 26B A4B trades some of that quality ceiling for significantly faster tokens-per-second in production inference workloads.

Benchmark Performance

Independent evaluations · Artificial Analysis

16.7%
Intelligence
39.3%
Coding Index
2.9%
Agentic Index

Accuracy & Capability Details

GPQA - Graduate Science79.2%
Humanity's Last Exam19.3%
SciCode - Scientific Coding40.0%
Instruction Following72.4%
Long Context Reasoning65.7%
τ²-Bench - Agentic Tasks43.6%
TerminalBench - System Control13.6%

Compare Models Side-by-Side

Evaluate specifications, pricing, and independent benchmark indices

Model Details
General Info
ProviderGoogleAnthropicAnthropic
Release DateApril 2, 2026September 22, 2026September 28, 2026
Knowledge Cutoff--Jun 2026
Context & Limits
Context Window262K
1M
Best Context Window
1M
Best Context Window
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input Pricing
$0.13
Best Input Pricing
$4$2
Output Pricing
$0.40
Best Output Pricing
$20$10
Modalities
Inputs
imagetextvideo
textimagefile
textimagefile
Outputs
text
text
text
Benchmarks (0-100)
Intelligence Index13.1
57.6
Best Intelligence Index
56.0
Coding Index---
Agentic Index---
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5

Humanity's Last Exam

Extremely difficult logical reasoning and knowledge.

12%
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 12%
Gemma 4 26B A4B
61%
Claude Opus 5.5
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 61%
Claude Opus 5.5
55%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 55%
Claude Sonnet 5.5

Long Context Reasoning

Logical reasoning over long context windows.

42%
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 42%
Gemma 4 26B A4B
85%
Claude Opus 5.5
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 85%
Claude Opus 5.5
83%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 83%
Claude Sonnet 5.5

SciCode Benchmark

Scientific coding and mathematical modeling.

37%
Gemma 4 26B A4B
SciCode Benchmark
Score: 37%
Gemma 4 26B A4B
67%
Claude Opus 5.5
SciCode Benchmark
Score: 67%
Claude Opus 5.5
61%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
SciCode Benchmark
Score: 61%
Claude Sonnet 5.5

Independent evaluation data provided by Artificial Analysis. To view the latest benchmarks and full details, visit their official site.

Explore more from Google

Other models by Google

Top AI Models

Leading alternatives by intelligence score

View all