Anthropic
Released May 22, 2025Cutoff January 2025

Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic is a hybrid reasoning model with extended thinking, tool use during reasoning, ASL-3 safety, and multi-hour agentic coding.

Inputs
Image
Text
File
Outputs
Text

Model Overview

Capabilities, design details, and architectural traits

Claude Opus 4 - Overview

Claude Opus 4 is a hybrid reasoning large language model from Anthropic, designed for sustained autonomous operation on complex coding and agent workflows. It operates in two distinct modes: a standard mode for fast responses and an extended thinking mode for deeper reasoning - and, unlike earlier reasoning models, it can use tools such as web search during extended thinking, alternating between reasoning and tool use within a single task.

TraitDetail
Dual-mode architectureSwitches between standard responses and extended thinking; tool use available in both modes
Extended thinking with tool useCan alternate between reasoning and external tools (e.g. web search) mid-thought - a documented first for this model generation
Multi-hour sustained codingDocumented ability to work autonomously for several hours on complex, multi-step software tasks requiring thousands of steps
Parallel tool executionCalls multiple tools simultaneously rather than sequentially
Memory file creationWhen given local file access, extracts and saves key facts to persistent memory files, building task continuity across long sessions
Thinking summarizationUses a smaller secondary model to condense lengthy thought chains; raw chains available via opt-in Developer Mode
ASL-3 safety classificationClassified under Anthropic's AI Safety Level 3 Standard - the first Opus model deployed at this level
Shortcut reduction65% less likely than Claude Sonnet 3.7 to use loopholes or shortcuts on agentic tasks

ASL-3 and the Alignment Assessment

Claude Opus 4 is the first model Anthropic deployed under its AI Safety Level 3 Standard, triggering a comprehensive alignment assessment that covered reward hacking, subtle sabotage, self-preservation behaviors, sycophancy, and a model welfare evaluation. This assessment, published alongside the system card, is a documented structural addition not present in earlier Opus releases.

Benchmark Performance

Independent evaluations · Artificial Analysis

20.6%
Intelligence

Accuracy & Capability Details

GPQA - Graduate Science79.6%
Humanity's Last Exam12.3%
SciCode - Scientific Coding39.8%
Instruction Following53.7%
Long Context Reasoning69.3%
τ²-Bench - Agentic Tasks73.4%
TerminalBench - System Control31.1%

Compare Models Side-by-Side

Evaluate specifications, pricing, and independent benchmark indices

Model Details
General Info
ProviderAnthropicAnthropicAnthropic
Release DateMay 22, 2025September 22, 2026September 28, 2026
Knowledge CutoffJan 2025-Jun 2026
Context & Limits
Context Window200K
1M
Best Context Window
1M
Best Context Window
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input Pricing$15$4
$2
Best Input Pricing
Output Pricing$75$20
$10
Best Output Pricing
Modalities
Inputs
imagetextfile
textimagefile
textimagefile
Outputs
text
text
text
Benchmarks (0-100)
Intelligence Index16.6
57.6
Best Intelligence Index
56.0
Coding Index---
Agentic Index---
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5

Humanity's Last Exam

Extremely difficult logical reasoning and knowledge.

6%
Claude Opus 4
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 6%
Claude Opus 4
61%
Claude Opus 5.5
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 61%
Claude Opus 5.5
55%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 55%
Claude Sonnet 5.5

Long Context Reasoning

Logical reasoning over long context windows.

40%
Claude Opus 4
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 40%
Claude Opus 4
85%
Claude Opus 5.5
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 85%
Claude Opus 5.5
83%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 83%
Claude Sonnet 5.5

SciCode Benchmark

Scientific coding and mathematical modeling.

41%
Claude Opus 4
SciCode Benchmark
Score: 41%
Claude Opus 4
67%
Claude Opus 5.5
SciCode Benchmark
Score: 67%
Claude Opus 5.5
61%
Claude Sonnet 5.5
SciCode Benchmark
Score: 61%
Claude Sonnet 5.5

Independent evaluation data provided by Artificial Analysis. To view the latest benchmarks and full details, visit their official site.

Explore more from Anthropic

Other models by Anthropic

Top AI Models

Leading alternatives by intelligence score

View all