Toolbit.aiToolbit.ai

Find, compare, and explore the best AI tools to match your specific tasks and use cases.

Explore

  • AI Search
  • Compare ToolsNew
  • Browse Categories
  • Trending Tools
  • Most Popular
  • New Additions

Resources

  • Updates HubNew
  • AI News
  • ModelsNew
  • Blog Articles
  • NewsletterNew

Company

  • Launch a Tool
  • Advertise with Us
  • Guest Post
  • Contact Us
© 2026 Toolbit.ai. All rights reserved.
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsDisclaimer
There's An AI For That favicon
There's An AI For That•The front page of AI for everyone
Toolbit.ai
Toolbit.ai
UpdatesNew
Blog
Toolbit.ai
Toolbit.ai
Toolbit.ai
Toolbit.ai
UpdatesNew
Blog
Sign in
  1. Home
  2. Updates
  3. Models
  4. MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax
Released February 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax M2.5 from MiniMax is positioned for agent teams, tool use, and productivity workflows with document editing and coding tasks.

Visit MiniMaxAnnouncement
Inputs
Text
Outputs
Text

Model Overview

Capabilities, design details, and architectural traits

MiniMax M2.5 - agent workflow model

MiniMax M2.5 is centered on agent workflows and productivity tasks. It is described as a model for complex execution, tool use, and document editing.

TraitDocumented detail
Agent teamsIt is presented for complex agent harnesses and coordinated agent work.
Tool useIt supports tool interaction and dynamic tool search during execution.
Office editingIt is documented for multi-turn editing in Excel, PowerPoint, and Word.
Coding and engineeringIt is highlighted for software delivery, bug hunting, security analysis, and ML tasks.

Workflow focus

The model is framed for tasks that need repeated execution and coordination, not only single-turn chat. Its distinguishing pattern is the combination of tool use, agent coordination, and structured office work.

Documented uses

Its public description emphasizes software engineering and document editing. That makes it a workflow-first model rather than a general-purpose wording of capability.

Benchmark Performance

Independent evaluations · Artificial Analysis

34.5%
Intelligence

Accuracy & Capability Details

GPQA - Graduate Science84.8%
Humanity's Last Exam20.5%
SciCode - Scientific Coding42.6%
Instruction Following71.6%
Long Context Reasoning72.0%
τ²-Bench - Agentic Tasks95.3%
TerminalBench - System Control34.8%
Specs
Context window
205Ktokens
Input pricing
$0.30per 1M tokens
Output pricing
$1.20per 1M tokens
Cached input
$0.03per 1M tokens

Prices in USD.

Key Capabilities & Ratings

Search Integration80%
Frontend Dev80%
Agentic Actions70%
Coding60%
Financial Analysis60%

Compare Models Side-by-Side

Evaluate specifications, pricing, and independent benchmark indices

Model Details
General Info
ProviderMiniMaxAnthropicAnthropic
Release DateFebruary 12, 2026July 24, 2026June 9, 2026
Knowledge Cutoff-May 2026-
Context & Limits
Context Window205K
1M
Best Context Window
1M
Best Context Window
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input Pricing
$0.30
Best Input Pricing
$5$10
Output Pricing
$1.20
Best Output Pricing
$25$50
Modalities
Inputs
text
textimage
textimagefile
Outputs
text
text
text
Benchmarks (0-100)
Intelligence Index34.5
63.1
Best Intelligence Index
62.1
Coding Index-
78.0
Best Coding Index
76.5
Agentic Index-
59.2
Best Agentic Index
56.6
MiniMax M2.5
Claude Opus 5
Claude Fable 5

GPQA Benchmark

Graduate-level reasoning and expert Q&A evaluation.

85%
MiniMax M2.5
GPQA Benchmark
Score: 85%
MiniMax M2.5
93%
Claude Opus 5
GPQA Benchmark
Score: 93%
Claude Opus 5
93%
Claude Fable 5
GPQA Benchmark
Score: 93%
Claude Fable 5

Humanity's Last Exam

Extremely difficult logical reasoning and knowledge.

21%
MiniMax M2.5
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 21%
MiniMax M2.5
55%
Claude Opus 5
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 55%
Claude Opus 5
56%
Claude Fable 5
Humanity's Last Exam
Score: 56%
Claude Fable 5

Long Context Reasoning

Logical reasoning over long context windows.

72%
MiniMax M2.5
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 72%
MiniMax M2.5
76%
Claude Opus 5
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 76%
Claude Opus 5
77%
Claude Fable 5
Long Context Reasoning
Score: 77%
Claude Fable 5

Independent evaluation data provided by Artificial Analysis. To view the latest benchmarks and full details, visit their official site.

Back to all models